Skip to main content

Research and Literature Review: An Educational Seminar Recap

Introduction:

On the agenda for today's seminar are two fundamental aspects of academic research: the literature review and research design. We will cover the roles and processes involved in crafting a literature review, proper documentation of references, and ethical considerations. Additionally, we will delve into research design, exploring its definition, the selection of appropriate designs, and the constraints faced during the research process.

Literature Review: A literature review serves multiple functions:

  1. Summarizing existing research on a topic.
  2. Interpreting and analyzing previous findings.
  3. Identifying gaps in the current knowledge.
  4. Supporting the research framework with established concepts and terminology.

Writing a Literature Review:

  1. Documenting References: Properly document all sources in APA format, ensuring that each citation includes the author's name, publication year, title, and source.
  2. Ethical Issues: Avoid plagiarism by summarizing and interpreting information in your own words and providing proper credit to original authors.

Research Design: A research design is the blueprint for conducting research. It includes:

  1. Defining the Problem: Clearly state the research problem or opportunity.
  2. Guiding Data Collection: Let data guide your decision-making process.
  3. Primary and Secondary Research: Primary research involves collecting new data through interviews, surveys, and observations. Secondary research involves analyzing existing data from databases, publications, and previous research.

Secondary Research: Secondary research allows researchers to:

  1. Determine the current level of knowledge.
  2. Assess the extent of what is known.
  3. Identify gaps and opportunities for further investigation.
  4. Establish a framework for problem-solving.

Known-Unknown Matrix: The known-unknown matrix helps identify areas that need further investigation:

  1. Known Knowns: Areas where existing knowledge is well-established.
  2. Known Unknowns: Areas identified for further research.
  3. Unknown Knowns: Areas that need to be recalled and re-examined.
  4. Unknown Unknowns: Challenging areas that require extensive investigation.

Peer-Reviewed vs. Non-Peer-Reviewed Sources: Peer-reviewed sources are considered more reliable because they undergo rigorous review by experts in the field. Non-peer-reviewed sources, such as newspapers and magazines, may contain biased or flawed information.

Evaluating Sources: When evaluating sources for a literature review, consider:

  1. Relevance: Is the information directly related to your research?
  2. Accuracy: Is the data from a reliable source?
  3. Timeliness: Is the information current, preferably within the last 20 years?

Conducting Research Using Excel: Excel can be a powerful tool for data analysis. For example, using the Data Analysis Toolpak, you can calculate descriptive statistics such as mean, median, mode, standard deviation, and more.

APA Referencing: Proper APA referencing involves:

  1. In-Text Citations: Citing sources within your text to give credit to original authors.
  2. Reference List: Providing a full bibliographical entry for each source at the end of your document.

Conclusion: By understanding the roles of literature reviews and research design, utilizing reliable sources, and applying proper referencing techniques, researchers can conduct thorough and ethical research. Remember, starting with the data and allowing it to guide your conclusions is crucial for maintaining objectivity and integrity in your research.

Popular posts from this blog

Terms of Use

Th e information here is presented as an education tool for individuals seeking to educate themselves on topics of investing and personal finance.  Do not interpret the information provided here as authoritative investment advice. MJ Industries is not a financial advisor and no opinions or information provided should be construed as investment advice. No author of this site is directly compensated for any information presented on this blog. You should always consult a qualified financial professional before investing.  Any past performance is no guarantee of our future returns and most likely variant on where and when value is found. Reproduction or use of any material written of this site is strictly prohibited.

Government's Role in Economics: Navigating Benefits, Challenges, and Failures

Introduction: In the realm of economic studies, understanding the role of government is paramount. While the focus of many examinations may revolve around chapters one to three, delving into chapter five provides insights into the government's power, potential benefits, and the challenges it encounters. This article aims to explore the economic advantages of government coercion, the difficulties in managing and directing governmental actions, and the occurrence of government failures. Government Coercion for Economic Benefit: At the core of government intervention lies the ability to coerce through transactions. An example of this coercion is the government's authority to reject mergers, as demonstrated when the merger of major banks, such as RBC, was denied to prevent anti-competitive practices. This form of intervention ensures fair competition and prevents entities from exploiting consumers. Challenges in Managing Government: Despite the potential benefits of government inte...

Bridging the Productivity Gap: How Skilled Trades Training Can Revitalize Canada's Economy

*Introduction:* Canada's productivity growth has been stagnant for decades, lagging behind other developed economies. This trend has significant implications for the country's competitiveness, economic growth, and standard of living. While various factors contribute to this issue, a crucial solution lies in investing in skilled trades training. This article explores how addressing the shortage of skilled tradespeople can help bridge Canada's productivity gap. *The Productivity Problem:* Canada's productivity growth has averaged only 1% annually since 2000, compared to 2.5% in the United States. This disparity translates to reduced economic growth, lower competitiveness, and decreased investment in innovation. The Conference Board of Canada estimates that if Canada's productivity growth had kept pace with that of the United States, the country's GDP would be approximately 20% higher today. *The Skilled Trades Shortage:* A significant contributor to Canada's p...