Skip to main content

Fractions and GCD

  • Simplifying Ratios:
  • Problem: Express in simplest form the ratio of 36 yards to 40 yards.
  • Solution: Divide both numbers by their greatest common divisor (GCD). In this case, the GCD of 36 and 40 is 4.36
  • 36÷440÷4=91
  • Tip: The simplified ratio is 9:10.

  • Calculating Shares:

    • Problem: A couple earned $8800, and their shares are in the ratio 5:3. Find the smallest and largest shares.
    • Solution:
      • Smallest Share: Use the ratio to divide the earnings.
        • Smallest share fraction: 35+3=38\frac{3}{5+3} = \frac{3}{8}
        • Smallest share amount: 38×8800
      • Largest Share:
        • Largest share fraction: 55+3=58\frac{5}{5+3} = \frac{5}{8}
        • Largest share amount: 58×8800

  • Storage Fee Calculation:

    • Problem: UMA farmers charged $64 for every 900 tons of products. Calculate the storage fee per ton and round to the nearest hundredth.
    • Solution:
      • Storage fee per ton: 64900
      • Rounded fee: $0.07 per ton.

  • Defective Engine Calculation:

    • Problem: An automobile assembly plant produced 243 engines, of which 27 were defective. Find the number of defective engines in 4130 engines produced.
    • Solution:
      • Defective rate: 27243=19\frac{27}{243} = \frac{1}{9}
      • Defective engines in 4130: 19×4130
      • Rounded result: 459 defective engines.

  • Simplifying Time Ratios:

    • Problem: Express in simplest form the ratio of 18 seconds to 15 seconds.
    • Solution: Divide both numbers by their GCD.
      • 1815=18÷315÷3=65\frac{18}{15} = \frac{18 \div 3}{15 \div 3} = \frac{6}{5}
    • Tip: The simplified ratio is 6:5.
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Terms of Use

Th e information here is presented as an education tool for individuals seeking to educate themselves on topics of investing and personal finance.  Do not interpret the information provided here as authoritative investment advice. MJ Industries is not a financial advisor and no opinions or information provided should be construed as investment advice. No author of this site is directly compensated for any information presented on this blog. You should always consult a qualified financial professional before investing.  Any past performance is no guarantee of our future returns and most likely variant on where and when value is found. Reproduction or use of any material written of this site is strictly prohibited.
Read more

Government's Role in Economics: Navigating Benefits, Challenges, and Failures

Introduction: In the realm of economic studies, understanding the role of government is paramount. While the focus of many examinations may revolve around chapters one to three, delving into chapter five provides insights into the government's power, potential benefits, and the challenges it encounters. This article aims to explore the economic advantages of government coercion, the difficulties in managing and directing governmental actions, and the occurrence of government failures. Government Coercion for Economic Benefit: At the core of government intervention lies the ability to coerce through transactions. An example of this coercion is the government's authority to reject mergers, as demonstrated when the merger of major banks, such as RBC, was denied to prevent anti-competitive practices. This form of intervention ensures fair competition and prevents entities from exploiting consumers. Challenges in Managing Government: Despite the potential benefits of government inte...
Read more

Bridging the Productivity Gap: How Skilled Trades Training Can Revitalize Canada's Economy

*Introduction:* Canada's productivity growth has been stagnant for decades, lagging behind other developed economies. This trend has significant implications for the country's competitiveness, economic growth, and standard of living. While various factors contribute to this issue, a crucial solution lies in investing in skilled trades training. This article explores how addressing the shortage of skilled tradespeople can help bridge Canada's productivity gap. *The Productivity Problem:* Canada's productivity growth has averaged only 1% annually since 2000, compared to 2.5% in the United States. This disparity translates to reduced economic growth, lower competitiveness, and decreased investment in innovation. The Conference Board of Canada estimates that if Canada's productivity growth had kept pace with that of the United States, the country's GDP would be approximately 20% higher today. *The Skilled Trades Shortage:* A significant contributor to Canada's p...
Read more